More on Elliott and Transfers from the ORCMay 6th 2008 |
1 comment |
1. the degree of closeness of any relationship, whether it be fiduciary, employee/employer and/or family in nature;
2. the past conduct of the proposed trainer; and
3. the licensing history of the proposed trainer."
Comments
Paul Siegel said...
I'm confused. Is WEG barring horses even if the ORC has approved their transfers to new trainers? Somehow I got that impression from the statements made by WEG mangement, but I could be wrong.
I see the ORC apparently corrected their error on Michelles Power's suspension. If I'm not mistaken they originally ruled she would be ineligible for 90 days, but have corrected that to say she is ineligible until she has a clean test. Someone must have pointed out that they were attempting to retroactively apply a rule adopted in January, 2008 to a positive from a race that took place in August, 2007. This does make me once again bring up a question about the ORC's failure to propose a specific suspension for Bill Elliott, while Pindur was given immediately 10 years plus 2 for violating probation. When the positives and suspensions were first announced, I questioned whether the ORC's lack of specificity was tied to the positive being from a race in 2007, before the stiffer rules were adopted. Will Elliott get off with a lesser penalty as a result?
posted at 3:20 PM on May 6th 2008




