Watch and Bet Harness Racing at TwinSpires.com
harnessracing.com
The Horsenman and Fair World
  • News Archive
  • Racing Reports
    • Sire's Progeny
    • Dam's Progeny
    • Single Horse
    • Leading Sires
    • Racing Recap
  • Sale Reports
    • Sire's Progeny
    • Dam's Progeny
    • Single Horse
    • Leading Sires
    • Sales Results
    • Sales Info
  • Calendars
    • Stakes Schedule
    • Sales Schedule
  • Entries/Results
    • USTA Entries
    • USTA Results
    • SC Entries
    • SC Results
  • Programs
    • TrackMaster® PPs
  • Guide Directory
  • Magazine Info
    • Issue Highlights
    • New Subscriptions
    • Renewals
    • Address Change
    • Advertising Rates
    • Send A Letter
« »
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
View all for this month

Click here for RSS

Ruling expected to decide location of NYSRWB trial

Return Home
February 01, 2010 Send To A Friend  | Print View

Justice Eileen Rakower will soon decide where the case of Ford, et al v. the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (NYSRWB) will be decided, New York County or Schenectady County

The NYSRWB, which has already been restrained by Justice Rakower from enforcing its new “out of competition” testing rules, wants the case moved to Schenectady  where its main office is located.

But on Friday, Jan. 29, lawyers for the Standardbred Owner’s Association (SOA) of New York and the other petitioners – Mark Ford, Richard Banca, John Brennan and George Casale – filed papers to keep the case in New York County with Justice Rakower, who already ruled that there are some problems with the new rules.

While, generally speaking, a plaintiff, or petitioner in this case, has the right to bring a case wherever he or she wants, it can be subject to certain constitutional and legal limitations.

Petitioners also point out that in similar cases, “venue” (where the case is heard) has been set in New York County against the NYSRWB when their rules have been challenged.

In the recent cases of Sumner v. Hogan (2008) and Gill v. NYSRWB (2008), were both allowed to proceed in New York County and both challenged NYSRWB rules.

In Sumner, the court specifically held that: “The fact that the petitioners seek to invalidate regulations that may have been drafted in Schenectady County should not prevent the litigation of this proceeding in New York County.”

In addition, the petitioners’s lawyers also attached an exhibit that listed some 30 cases against the NYSRWB that were decided in New York County, 11 of them in the last five years.

The location of this case is important for a number of reasons. The NYSRWB might obtain a “home court” advantage in Schenectady, where there are fewer judges and fewer cases. However they do have an office right in Manhattan and all of the petitioners live much closer to New York County than Schenectady. A decision is expected in the next few weeks. – By Steve Kallas


« Back

Bookmark and Share
Home :: News Archive :: Racing Reports :: Sale Reports :: Calendars :: Guide Directory :: Contact The Staff
Advertising Rates & Information For: Horseman And Fair World Magazine :: HarnessRacing.com :: Harness Racing Weekend Preview
Website Design by eLink Design, Inc. A Lexington Web Design Company :: Hosted by Intelliwire, LLC, An Offsite Backup Company
Site contents may not be reproduced without the expressed written consent of the publisher.
© 2012 Horseman Publishing Co., Lexington KY, All Rights Reserved