The rally at the Seitz has long been a vocal supporter of slots at tracks and his previous setbacks as a sponsor of legislation to help horse racing hasn’t discouraged him. “The sweetest words in the English language are ‘I told you so,’” said Seitz in explaining how he included a slots provision in 2003 that was later removed by the full Senate. “Just think of how much money we would have generated by now if we’d approved slots then,” said the Seitz acknowledged the opposition to slots by some in the media, but asked if they would pose a question to all Ohioans to ask their preference of: (1) increased taxes (2) cuts in state services for programs they personally use (3) slots at tracks. He said he was sure that Ohioans would overwhelming approve slots if asked that question. Seitz said that Busloads of horsemen came from the state’s four pari-mutuel tracks and many others gathered on the Willie Koester, chairman of the Ohio State Racing Commission, outlined the plan that the commission submitted to the legislature and said that it was “unusual and unprecedented” because the state of He lamented the loss of quality horses in “Are you going to race for a ham sandwich in Koester acknowledged that some in the Thoroughbred industry have been slow to embrace the slots plan because it doesn’t specify how the money will be allocated for horse racing. “Sometimes you have to take a leap of faith,” said Koester, who has personally lobbied many elected officials on behalf of the commission plan. Other elected officials who spoke at the rally were Rep. Dan Stewart of Columbus, Rep. Ray Pryor of
|




